The post Dains Group Grows National Presence with Acquisition of Barnes Roffe appeared first on AGN International.
]]>
Barnes Roffe, one of the UK’s top 50 accounting firms, will join the Dains Group on 4 June 2025, significantly strengthening the client proposition in financial advisory, corporate tax, audit, and corporate finance. The Barnes Roffe team has over 29 partners and more than 200 employees in the London area.
The acquisition, which is the largest yet by the Group, means Dains will now have established four key regional hubs across the UK and Ireland — in the South-East, Midlands, Scotland and Ireland — and are on target to become a top 20 firm by the end of 2025.
Barnes Roffe has a strong reputation as a highly customer-centric and proactive business with a talented team. It has built a reputation for delivering outstanding value and service to its clients for over 125 years, since its establishment in 1899.
Stephen Corner, Senior Partner at Barnes Roffe, commented, “By partnering with Dains we are joining a firm with the same values and underlying service proposition we have been delivering to our clients for many years and together we will deliver a truly market leading proposition for our clients. Becoming part of a national firm widens our service proposition and increases the range of specialist services we can deliver whilst at the same time greatly enhancing the career opportunities for our talented team. We look forward to significantly growing the Dains business in the South-East.”
“We are thrilled to welcome Barnes Roffe to the Dains Group.” said Richard McNeilly, CEO of the Dains Group. “It’s not often we encounter such a dynamic and client-centric leadership team. Together, we see significant opportunities to grow our presence in the London area and expand across the UK and Ireland. The addition of Barnes Roffe strengthens our national footprint and aligns perfectly with our strategy to deliver exceptional client service and outstanding career opportunities.”
With a team now exceeding 1,000 professionals, we remain committed to enhancing the value we provide to clients and investing in the development of our talented people.
Our ambition is to work in partnership with clients, offering timely, thoughtful advice rooted in a deep understanding of their goals. This approach has underpinned Barnes Roffe’s impressive growth and makes them a natural strategic partner for our group.”
Pete Wilson, Partner at IK Partners added “This strategic acquisition demonstrates our ambition to continue building Dains into the leading UK & Ireland SME advisory business by establishing a strong presence, led by an outstanding team at Barnes Roffe, in London and the South-East. We look forward to continuing to back further acquisitions as part of this exciting partnership.”
Dains were advised by CMS (Legal), Eight Advisory (Financial and Tax Due Diligence), Forward Corporate Finance (Financial Modelling), Deloitte (Tax Structuring), PDW (Customer Referencing), Cyber Crowd (IT Due Diligence), Mercia (Technical Due Diligence).
Barnes Roffe were advised by KPMG CF (Corporate Finance) and KPMG Legal (Legal).

The post Dains Group Grows National Presence with Acquisition of Barnes Roffe appeared first on AGN International.
]]>The post Press Release: JRD Hosts the 2025 AGN German-Speaking Meeting in Warsaw, Poland appeared first on AGN International.
]]>The meeting began on Thursday evening with a relaxed networking cruise along the Vistula River, offering attendees panoramic views of the Warsaw skyline in summer light. The friendly atmosphere was immediately evident, with many participants reconnecting after some time apart. The informal setting helped to ease into meaningful conversations and re-establish personal connections – a hallmark of AGN events.
Focused and Forward-Looking: The Technical Program
Friday featured a full day of technical sessions tailored to current challenges and opportunities in cross-border professional practice. Topics included:
The day opened with a video address from AGN CEO Malcolm Ward, who provided a strategic update on the organisation’s global priorities and member initiatives.
A Cultural and Collaborative Experience
On Friday evening, attendees visited the historic Koneser Vodka Distillery, where they enjoyed a guided tour, tasting experience, and a short film produced by JRD Tax exclusively for the event. The program also included a talk on the Polish economy, a themed quiz, and a formal dinner at one of Warsaw’s top restaurants – an ideal setting for continued discussion and camaraderie.
On Saturday, those remaining took part in a guided tour of Warsaw’s Old Town, with time to explore its heritage sites and charming local streets. The cultural program added a deeper appreciation for the city and gave members more space to connect beyond the meeting room.
Shared Purpose and Lasting Value
The organisers extend their sincere thanks to all who participated, noting the high level of engagement, openness, and expertise shared across the weekend. The event reflected AGN’s ongoing commitment to building strong professional relationships, staying ahead of technical developments, and embracing the distinctiveness of its members.
Participant Reflections


“Tomasz and his team at JRD did a great job hosting the German-speaking meeting of AGN in Warsaw. Great content, excellent speakers – and best of all, you felt the heart of the great people of Poland. It felt like home to me. Looking forward to our next exchange.”
— André Marius Le Prince, Partner, WLP GmbH, Hamburg








The post Press Release: JRD Hosts the 2025 AGN German-Speaking Meeting in Warsaw, Poland appeared first on AGN International.
]]>The post A Guide to Funding Future Investment – Raise new capital funds or is it time to sell up? appeared first on AGN International.
]]>Investing in new technologies and funding new skills and fresh talent, all while maintaining independence and your firms unique culture, is no doubt a tall order. The pressure to embrace and resolve these matters is relentless. Competitive pressure, productivity and workload pressure or the pressure of modernizing and transforming your business in the face of near constant developments in technology – all bring the need for capital funds into focus. Some firms rely on a strong balance sheet with reinvested profits. Others draw on modest capital injections from retained earnings, bank lending, or new equity partners, or external backing.
This AGN Global Business Voice publication synthesizes seven strategic capital-raising routes available to AGN member firms. Each has unique advantages, trade-offs. Their strategic fits depending on the firm’s objectives, risk appetite, and ownership philosophy.

Left, is an illustrative schematic comparing relative partner autonomy, timescale commitment and funding
potential between options. Individual circumstances and deal structures vary widely, impacting this assessment, and
below we explore the potential pros and cons of all these approaches.
On the move?
Tune into our mini podcast on Spotify at the end of this article for a quick summary of the key insights.
Below is AGNs checklist of matters you should consider at the start of your journey to raise capital resources for your firm: The checklist would make useful section headings for an internal project report.
| AGN Capital Raising Checklist… At a very high level there are a series of practical steps that members should consider at the beginning of a journey to raising required capital funding: |
|---|
| 1. Conduct a strategic capital needs assessment |
| 2. Evaluate your current financial and ownership position |
| 3. Map all viable funding options |
| 4. Engage and align key stakeholders |
| 5. Develop a capital raising plan |
| 6. Strengthen your attractiveness to investors or lenders |
| 7. Seek specialist advice early |
| 8. Use AGN tools & networks |
| 9. Balance growth with culture |
| 10. Plan for integration, repayment, or exit |
Perhaps not the most obvious starting point, but perhaps it’s possible to avoid the need for raising capital altogether? Strategic alliances involve partnering with another organization to drive mutual growth—without full mergers. Accounting firms may align with other firms, consulting or tech businesses, or join investor-backed networks. These arrangements aim to leverage strengths such as client bases, expertise, or technology access. While alliances typically don’t bring a large one-time capital injection, they often reduce capital needs and generate new revenue.
| Benefits | Challenges |
|---|---|
| 1. Access to Resources and Technology Alliances help firms access tech or skills they lack in-house. A mid-sized firm could benefit from a partner’s AI auditing tools, cybersecurity capabilities, or back-office systems—improving digital maturity without full cost burden. | 1. Limited Capital Injection Unless the alliance includes investment, there’s no direct cash inflow. While some models (e.g., VC-backed alliances) do invest in member firm tech, most deliver value indirectly via referrals or shared tools. |
| 2. Expanded Services and Market Reach By teaming up, firms can offer broader solutions—e.g., combining tax services with IT consulting. Alliances open new markets and client opportunities that would otherwise be inaccessible alone. | 2. Coordination Complexity Alliances require effort to align on fees, roles, and quality. Joint projects need clear structures. Mismanagement can confuse clients or delay outcomes. |
| 3. Shared Costs and Risk Collaborative initiatives split costs. Firms might jointly develop a platform or co-market services, lowering financial exposure for each. | 3. Potential for Conflict or Dependency Disagreements can arise if goals diverge. Over-reliance on a partner for key resources creates risk if the relationship ends or underperforms. |
| 4. Independence Retained Alliances preserve local identity and control. Firms keep their branding and decision-making while benefiting from scale advantages like training and infrastructure. | 4. Brand Dilution If not carefully positioned, a firm’s individual identity may be overshadowed. Success may be attributed to the alliance instead of the firm, affecting perception and control over marketing. |
| 5. Talent and Client Appeal Affiliation with broader networks or firms enhances credibility. It reassures clients and appeals to recruits who want big-firm resources with small-firm culture. | 5. No Guaranteed Results Alliances require active participation. Without follow-through, benefits may not materialize. Unlike mergers, alliances can fade if neglected. |
Alliances are ideal for firms seeking capability growth over sheer size. For example, a 15-partner firm strong in compliance might partner with a consulting boutique to add advisory depth. Joining an international network allows service expansion across borders, and tech alliances can support transformation goals at lower costs.
Most strategic alliances do not involve equity transfer. Firms remain independently owned. For instance, if a tax firm allies with a tech consultancy, ownership doesn’t change—just a contractual collaboration forms.
Some newer alliance models include small equity stakes—usually in non-attest services—funded by investors. Even then, these are minority holdings and preserve autonomy. Any equity dilution is typically minimal and structured to
retain partner control.
Short-Term
Quick wins may include shared client opportunities or access to new tools. For example, a firm could immediately pitch for a larger client using its partner’s capabilities.
Medium-Term (1–3 yrs)
With active collaboration, referrals
grow, services integrate, and costs reduce. For example after two years, a firm might see 10–15% of new business linked to
the alliance.
Long-Term (3–5+ yrs)
Strong alliances can deepen, evolve into mergers, or become
a firm’s key strategic pillar. International affiliations, for example, support consistent
innovation and client expansion over time.
Alliances are ideal for firms seeking capability growth over sheer size. For example, a 15-partner firm strong in compliance might partner with a consulting boutique to add advisory depth. Joining an international network allows service expansion across borders, and tech alliances can support transformation goals at lower costs.
Strategic alliances offer a balanced path to growth. While not suited for firms needing fast capital, they enable mid-sized practices to stay competitive, broaden their offer, and access tech—all without giving up control. For firms that want to remain themselves but do more, alliances are a powerful tool. They amplify capabilities, reduce cost burdens, and allow firms to punch above their weight—especially when well-managed and mutually beneficial.
PE firms see medium-sized accountancy practices as attractive due to recurring revenues, strong client relationships, and potential for digital and service transformation. These firms provide a foundation for platform-building, where PE can drive rapid growth through add-on acquisitions and operational efficiency.
PE firms look for:
Firms demonstrating digital maturity, operational efficiency, and strategic clarity are especially appealing Introduction. Firms with specialist services (e.g., tax, corporate finance, ESG, or tech consulting) often command higher valuations, especially when they’ve embraced digital tools and can scale.
| Benefits | Challenges |
|---|---|
| 1. Significant Capital Injection PE provides large amounts of capital to fund expansion, technology upgrades, M&A, and new service lines—enabling faster transformation than organic growth alone. | 1. Loss of Independence PE investors typically require control or strong influence—meaning partners may lose autonomy over key decisions and the firm’s strategic direction. |
| 2. Liquidity for Partners Partners can cash out part or all of their equity, offering an exit path or personal wealth diversification—particularly useful for retiring founders. | 2. Cultural Clash Risk The commercially-driven approach of PE can conflict with traditional partner culture— especially if decisions become overly profit-driven. |
| 3. Access to Strategic Expertise CPE firms bring experience in scaling businesses, improving operational efficiency, and driving profitability—often through professionalised governance and systems. | 3. Pressure for High ROI and Exit PE has a defined time horizon (typically 3–7 years) and will push for aggressive growth and an eventual exit—often a sale or IPO. (Known as a ‘flip). |
| 4. Accelerated Growth With financial backing, firms can move quickly into new geographies or markets, acquire competitors, and scale niche services. | 4. Dilution of Ownership Existing partners must give up equity in exchange for capital. From the get go founders may hold only a minority stake. (Although there are examples of PE taking a minority stake). |
| 5. Talent Attraction and Retention Equity-linked incentives (e.g. options or profit-sharing schemes) can attract high-performing professionals who want ownership or upside in growth. | 5. Staff Disruption Uncertainty about changes in leadership, roles, or firm direction can unsettle staff. If not managed well, it can lead to attrition. |
| 6. Enhanced Valuation Through Transformation Digitalisation, specialisation, and consolidation driven by PE can increase the overall value of the firm beyond what could be achieved solo. | 6. Complexity and Legal Restructuring A PE deal often requires reorganisation of the firm structure (e.g., incorporation), changes to ownership rules, and significant legal and advisory costs. |
| 7. Debt Treatment Firms should be cautious around how the investment debt is treated. If it’s added to the firms own P&L then this creates greater risk and a significant repayment burden. |
Engaging with PE isn’t without risk. Key challenges include:
AGN members should assess whether they’re ready for the demands and shifts that come with PE capital.
Valuations are typically based on a multiple of EBITDA, adjusted for growth potential, risk profile, and strategic assets. Factors increasing valuation include:
Multiple uplift can range from 5x EBITDA for traditional firms to 10–12x for digitally mature firms.
AGN firms can:
Banks, credit organisations and other financial institutions allow firms to raise capital via debt—commonly through term loans, lines of credit, or specialized instruments. Accounting firms with stable revenue streams can often secure sizable loans, though usually with personal guarantees equity or seconded on Trading history or forecast future performance. While debt doesn’t dilute ownership, it does require repayment with interest.
| Benefits | Challenges |
|---|---|
| 1. Retain Full Ownership Firms maintain complete control. Unlike equity, bank loans don’t involve giving up any stake or inviting external influence on decisions. | 1. Repayment Risk Loan repayments are mandatory regardless of business performance. Revenue dips can strain finances, leading to potential default. |
| 2. Flexible Use of Funds Loan proceeds can typically be used for a broad range of business needs—from IT upgrades to marketing, hiring, or office renovations. This flexibility supports growth strategies like digital transformation. | 2. Interest and Fees Loans incur interest and potentially other costs (e.g., origination fees). With rising interest rates, the cost of new debt has grown. |
| 3. Tailored Terms Different loan types suit different horizons: Short-term: working capital or seasonal needs. Medium-term: growth projects. Long-term: durable assets like office buildings or major IT systems. | 3. Collateral and Guarantees Banks typically require collateral or partner guarantees, sometimes, not always, placing personal assets at risk. |
| 4. Lower Cost of Capital Interest payments (often tax-deductible) may be cheaper in the long run than giving away a share of profits to equity investors. | 4. Loan Covenants Loan agreements often contain restrictions. Breaching these may lead to penalties or loan recall. |
| 5. Familiar, Streamlined Process Banks have established lending procedures and often understand professional service firms. Predictable revenues and strong client retention help firms qualify. | 5. Limited Capital Availability Loan amounts are constrained by cash flow and collateral and business performance. Medium-sized firms might secure less than equity could provide. |
| 6. No Strategic Input Banks offer no strategic advice or mentorship— just capital. |
Bank financing suits firms with reliable income, financial discipline, and clear ROI plans. Examples include investing in new software or expansion that can be repaid from increased future revenue.
Debt financing doesn’t alter ownership. Profits stay internal after interest. While lenders may require transparency, they don’t interfere with governance.
Short-Term
Revolving lines of credit are ideal for temporary cash flow gaps or seasonal needs.
Medium-Term (1–3 yrs)
3–7 year loans suit projects like digital upgrades or launching new services.
Long-Term (3–5+ yrs)
Real estate or highly durable needs can justify 10+ year loans,
though they’re uncommon for
intangible investments.
Bank financing is a practical, non-dilutive funding route for medium-sized firms. It supports independence and growth if firms are financially disciplined and confident in their repayment capacity.
An Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) allows a firm to transfer ownership to employees through a trust, often using a loan (leveraged ESOP) to buy partner shares. Over time, profits repay the loan and shares are allocated to employees— usually based on salary or tenure. It’s a form of internal succession and financing, with the added benefit of boosting engagement and retention. Though rare in accounting, ESOPs are gaining traction after BDO USA’s notable adoption in 2023.
| Benefits | Challenges |
|---|---|
| 1. Strong Talent Retention and Attraction ESOPs give employees a stake in the firm’s success, often boosting loyalty and engagement. As a no-cost retirement benefit, it helps firms stand out in recruitment and signals a people-first culture. | 1. Complex and Costly Setup Creating an ESOP requires restructuring as a corporation, hiring specialists, annual valuations, and ongoing regulatory compliance. These administrative costs can be burdensome for smaller or less profitable firms. |
| 2. Internal Ownership Transition ESOPs preserve independence—ownership transfers to employees, not outsiders. Leadership remains intact, and governance can be structured to retain partner control, making it a strategic way to raise capital while staying private. | 2. Financial Risk via Debt Many ESOPs require loans, creating substantial debt that the firm repays over time. If cash flow falters, the burden can strain finances—especially in firms without strong recurring revenue. |
| 3. Succession and Liquidity for Partners Selling to an ESOP allows retiring partners to exit gradually or all at once. The firm buys equity at fair market value via ESOP loans or contributions—often offering better terms than internal sales while preserving the firm’s legacy | 3. Ownership Dilution Partners’ equity shrinks as shares transfer to employees. Though philosophically easier to accept than outside investors, it still changes firm dynamics and requires partners to embrace a broader ownership model. |
| 4. Tax Benefits In some countries contributions to the ESOP are tax-deductible, and in S-corps, profits attributable to ESOP ownership can be tax-free and/or sellers may defer capital gains tax. The tax advantage vary. | 4. Future Repurchase Obligation In some ESOP arrangements, employees retire or leave, the firm must buy back their ESOP shares. This liability can grow over time and must be planned for to avoid cash flow constraints later. |
| 5. Performance Gains Firms with ESOPs often outperform peers in productivity and profitability due to greater employee motivation. A culture of ownership can lead to better service, innovation, and retention—supporting long-term growth. | 5. Licensing and Regulatory Challenges Some jurisdictions limit non-CPA ownership. ESOPs must be carefully structured to avoid breaching regulations, particularly in audit-focused practices, potentially limiting the firm’s ability to go fully ESOP-owned. |
ESOPs work well for firms with steady profits, low debt, and a deep team—especially those facing leadership succession. If a firm has retiring partners and engaged staff, an ESOP can align interests, provide exit capital, and retain independence.
Short-Term (Year 1)
Setting up takes 6–12 months. Immediate benefits include liquidity for selling partners and a morale
boost from employee ownership. Operationally, the firm sees little change—no immediate growth or
client influx.
Medium-Term (1–5 yrs)
The firm begins servicing the ESOP loan, adjusting cash
flow. Employees start seeing themselves as owners, which can improve engagement
and retention. The firm might start attracting talent with its employee-owned status and market itself differently.
Long-Term (5–10+ yrs)
RWith the loan repaid, the firm’s financial position strengthens.
Employees accumulate
meaningful retirement value. The firm may complete its succession plan via additional
ESOP transactions and sustain a strong, independent model.
A typical ESOP transaction sees the trust owning 20–40% of the firm. Employees benefit economically, but governance often remains with partners or a designated trustee. Over time, some scenarios mean that firms can transition to 100% employee ownership—though many remain partially ESOP-owned to balance control and shared benefits.
An ESOP is a strategic, long-term ownership and capital solution—not a quick fix. It supports gradual succession, can build a performance culture, and is likely to help firms preserve independence while rewarding staff. For medium-sized firms with a long view and strong fundamentals, ESOPs can support cultural and financial continuity.
Internal funding involves using the firm’s own partners—current or incoming—to raise capital. This can be through capital contributions, retained earnings, or new partner buy-ins. It’s a traditional method that keeps ownership within the firm, often facilitating generational succession.
| Benefits | Challenges |
|---|---|
| 1. Preserved Control and Culture Ownership stays within the practitioner group, maintaining the firm’s culture, autonomy, and long-term service values. No external influence alters strategic decisions. | 1. Limited Capital Funds are constrained by partners’ personal means or firm profits. Buy-ins, while valuable, are often modest compared to what external investors could offer. |
| 2. Trusted and Familiar Processs Internal funding involves people who know the firm, making transitions smoother. Retiring partners can often choose successors, and trust simplifies negotiations. | 2. Personal Financial Burden New and existing partners may need personal loans or dip into savings or access to a firms banking equity loan. This can deter prospective partners, affecting retention and succession. |
| 3. Flexible Terms Buyouts and capital injections can be structured to suit cash flow—payouts spread over years, staged buy-ins, or firm-arranged loans—all negotiable internally. | 3. Slower Growth form Investment Strategy Growth maybe more gradual, limited by internal resources. Larger investments may be postponed or broken into phases, risking competitive disadvantage. |
| 4. Talent Development Incentive Creating ownership opportunities motivates high performers. Offering equity stakes fosters loyalty and strengthens the leadership pipeline. | 4. Strain from Retirement Payouts Deferred payments to retiring partners can drain profits—especially with multiple retirements— reducing funds available for growth. |
| 5. Simplified Regulatory Compliance No need for outside approvals or restructuring. As new owners are typically licensed professionals, ownership remains in compliance with regulatory standards. | 5. Risk of Inequity or Tension Differences in buy-in amounts or timing may lead to perceived unfairness. Ownership could skew toward those with deeper pockets, rather than merit. |
Internal funding is ideal for stable, independently minded firms with upcoming leaders. It suits planned, moderate capital needs—like phased tech upgrades or service expansion—and firms aiming for long-term sustainability.
For instance, a 15-partner firm with retiring seniors and rising managers might use this model to transfer ownership and raise funds simultaneously. It works well when firms reinvest profits year over year, supporting continuous but controlled evolution.
Short-Term
Firms can defer distributions or call
for small capital injections from partners to manage short-term needs. These measures help bridge cash flow gaps or seed smaller projects.
Medium-Term
A plan to admit new partners and retain earnings over 1–5 years can fund initiatives like office expansions or IT upgrades. Discipline and forecasting are key.
Long-Term
A steady intake of new partners and ongoing reinvestment builds capital slowly but
securely. Firms might allocate a percentage of revenue annually
into a development or tech fund—aligning capital formation
with strategy.
Internal funding maintains full control within the partner group. While equity percentages shift as partners enter or retire, there’s no external ownership dilution. New partner contributions strengthen the firm’s balance sheet and
support future investments.
In some firms, senior staff may hold small stakes, but ownership still remains internal. This approach reinforces legacy and succession, creating continuity from one generation of partners to the next.
Internal funding can struggle to meet urgent or large-scale investment needs. For example, a sudden need to adopt an expensive new audit platform might exceed the firm’s internal capacity. If no one is willing or able to buy in, internal succession plans can falter, making external
funding necessary.
For these reasons, many firms use internal funding as a foundation but remain open to supplementing it with loans or outside capital for larger or time-sensitive projects.
Internal partner funding is the most traditional financing method for professional service firms. It supports control, stability, and long-term continuity, but comes with limits on capital availability and speed.
It’s most effective when aligned with a forward-looking succession plan and used for investments that can be planned and phased over time. For medium-sized accounting firms prioritizing independence, internal funding provides a reliable, sustainable approach—especially when supplemented with other capital sources as needed.
Merging with or being acquired by another firm can inject capital, solve succession issues, and provide scale. It trades independence for resources and often forms part of consolidation strategies in the accounting sector.
| Benefits | Challenges |
|---|---|
| 1. Immediate Scale & Resources Gains access to tech, clients, and infrastructure of a larger firm. | 1. Loss of Identity Merging typically ends a firm’s independent branding and culture. |
| 2. Partner Liquidity Partners can cash out or take shares, reducing risk. | 2. Client/Staff Disruption Risks include client attrition, redundancies, and morale issues. |
| 3. Staff Opportunities Offers broader career paths and may improve retention. | 3. Strategic Shift Risk Larger firm may phase out services or clients the smaller firm values. |
| 4. Succession Planning Solves retirement transitions without needing internal successors. | 4. Earn-outs & Status Loss Deals may include performance targets, and former partners might lose authority. |
| 5. Potential Equity Upside Partners may benefit from larger firm’s future growth if shares are received. | 5. Regulatory Changes New compliance obligations (e.g., independence rules) may apply. |
Ideal for firms lacking internal succession or facing tech/cost pressures. A one-time, long-term strategic shift offering short-term liquidity and stability under a larger platform.
Original ownership dissolves. Partners either cash out or join a larger ownership pool. This is full dilution in exchange for future security and support.
An Initial Public Offering (IPO) represents a bold capital-raising move—opening a professional services firm to public investment by listing on a stock exchange. Although rare in the accountancy world, a handful of firms, particularly in legal and advisory services, have paved the way. Going public can unlock substantial capital, raise brand visibility, and enable rapid expansion—but not without significant governance and regulatory burdens.
| Benefits | Challenges |
|---|---|
| 1. Access to Large-Scale Capital IPOs can raise significant funds for expansion, acquisitions, or technological upgrades. Large institutional investors often provide long-term backing. | 1. Regulatory Hurdles Professional ownership restrictions vary by jurisdiction. For instance, audit firms are often precluded from going public. |
| 2. Enhanced Brand Credibility Public companies typically gain prestige, improving client trust and attracting top talent. | 2. Cultural Shift Required Public ownership changes the firm’s focus—from partnership culture to shareholder value— potentially undermining legacy values. |
| 3. Liquidity for Existing Partners IPOs can offer partners a chance to realise part of their equity, enhancing personal financial flexibility. | 3. Market Pressure for Short-Term Result Quarterly reporting cycles and shareholder expectations may force firms to prioritise profit over long-term value or client care. |
| 4. Acquisition Currency Listed shares become a useful currency for M&A, allowing firms to scale faster by issuing stock instead of cash. | 4. Loss of Privacy and Control Listed firms face continuous disclosure obligations, open public scrutiny, and must navigate shareholder activism. |
| 5. Governance Public firms must meet rigorous reporting and governance standards—perhaps driving better internal processes. | 5. High Cost and Complexity of Listing The IPO process requires expensive advisors, regulatory filings, and may take 12–24 months to complete. |
The most high profile listing of firm listings took place in the early 90s with the likes of Numerica and Tenon floating on the UK AIM exchange – a not entirely successful venture. However, listing is back in vogue if in a lower key format largely for the legal sector; Knights Group (UK Law Firm): Listed on the London Stock Exchange AIM in 2018. The Australian legal sector saw firms like Shine Lawyers and Slater & Gordon have listed successfully, demonstrating that professional service businesses can work as public companies—if structured properly.
For most AGN members, a full IPO may not be an immediate option, however, the idea of a quasi-public route is evolving. Firms might:
The autonomy of the founding partners is reduced—but capital availability and future liquidity options are greatly enhanced.
Short-Term (0–2 yrs)
Begin preparing by incorporating, auditing financials, building governance structures, and exploring alternative market models (e.g. dual shares, carve-outs).
Medium-Term (2–5 yrs)
Firms may raise pre-IPO funds, test investor appetite, or launch a
minority IPO of a subsidiary.
Long-Term (5+ yrs)
Full-scale IPO possible—subject to jurisdictional reforms and sustained firm performance. A credible path if firm seeks market leadership.
| Government Grants or Subsidies: |
| – Some governments offer funding for tech or training. While modest, these are non-dilutive and suitable for short-term, specific projects. |
| Venture Capital / Angel Investment: |
| – Not typical for accounting services, but viable if spinning off a tech product. The core firm stays independent, while the innovation entity raises external capital. |
| Crowdfunding / Private Stock Offering: |
| – Rare due to regulations, but possible through private placements or in countries allowing public listing of professional. |
| Private Family Office “Evergreen” Investment Model: |
| – Long-term capital investment from a family office instead of PE firms. – More patient capital, focused on steady growth rather than fast exits. – Allows firms to remain independent while securing funds for development. |
| Hybrid Partnership-PE Model: |
| – Maintains a core group of equity partners while selling a minority stake to PE investors. – Balances external capital for growth while retaining traditional partnership governance. – Helps existing teams maintain control and cultural integrity. – AGN Swedish member Frejs has taken this approach with a minority investment from AdeliS into a new parent organisation called Cedra. |
| Cooperative Ownership Model: |
| – Shared ownership between employees, partners, and even clients or industry stakeholders. – Encourages long-term decision-making and aligns incentives across all stakeholders. – Rare but viable in professional services where sustainability and independence are priorities. |
| Strategic Alliances with Shared Ownership Pools: |
| – Instead of full mergers, firms create equity pools across multiple firms. – Used to create economies of scale, share tech investments, and enable joint market expansion. – Could work well within international associations like AGN to build integrated service offerings without ceding full PE control. |
| Minority Investor + Employee Option Pool: |
| – External investors take a minority stake while employees get share options. – Reduces challenge of cultural shift compared to full PE ownership. – Provides liquidity while keeping leadership incentives aligned |
The ability to raise and deploy capital strategically is an increasingly important factor for successful modern accounting firms. Whether it’s attracting private equity, borrowing from a bank, unlocking internal funds, forming alliances, building an ESOP, or merging with a peer, each pathway has a place in a firm’s journey.
AGN members are encouraged to reflect on their current and future needs—balancing ambition, independence, and succession planning. In many cases, a hybrid approach offers both agility and stability. Use this guide as a diagnostic and discussion tool with your leadership team as you build your future-ready firm.
Tune into our mini podcast on Spotify for a quick summary of the key insights.
Copyright © 2025 AGN International Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted by non-members without prior permission of AGN International Ltd.
The post A Guide to Funding Future Investment – Raise new capital funds or is it time to sell up? appeared first on AGN International.
]]>The post Chaordic CFO – Managing DISTRESS in an Uncertain Future appeared first on AGN International.
]]>Chaordic perfectly describes the environment finance leaders now operate in, a fusion of chaos and order. In March 2025, R Venkatakrishnan wrote an article titled Accounting in the Era of STEM, published in The Hindu Business Line. The piece explored the changing landscape of the finance profession amidst the rise of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics disciplines. The response was overwhelming and encouraging. It prompted a deeper reflection—not just on accounting per se, but on the evolving nature of leadership in finance, particularly the CFO’s role.
That journey, and the conversations it sparked, culminated in an address to a forum of senior finance professionals on the theme: “Chaordic CFO – Managing DISTRESS in an Uncertain Future.” The title was a deliberate play, on both the emotional and structural stress, experienced in today’s business world, and on the leadership compass needed to manage it.
Was used as a strategic acronym Disruption, Innovation, Strategy, Transformational Growth, Resilience, Execution, Storytelling, and Stakeholder Management. Each dimension reflects an area where the CFO’s responsibilities have evolved. The objective is not merely to diagnose corporate pain points, but to offer a roadmap moving from distress to ‘eustress’ a productive, purposeful stress that drives excellence.
Perfectly describes the environment finance leaders now operate in, a fusion of chaos and order. Today’s CFO must strike a balance between structure and innovation, compliance and creativity. Systems must be self-organising, adaptive, and resilient. Too much order leads to rigidity and missed opportunities. Too much chaos results in collapse and confusion. The Chaordic CFO thrives in this space, designing systems that are stable yet agile prepared for disruption, but wired for reinvention. Chaordic is not about eliminating uncertainty it is about leveraging it for growth.
In a world of exponential change technological acceleration, regulatory flux, ESG expectations, and geopolitical uncertainty—finance professionals are under more pressure than ever. For decades, they have been trained to drive by looking in the rear-view mirror, obsessing over historical data. But in today’s landscape, that’s not just limiting it is dangerous.
Marshall Goldsmith’s famous book, ‘What Got You Here Won’t Get You There’, speaks to a mindset shift. Past strengths become blind spots. Comfort zones calcify. To lead in the modern enterprise, CFOs must let go of outdated patterns and embrace agility. The real question is not whether change is coming it is whether we are ready to stay ahead of it.
Disruption is not a trend in this environment. Technology is reshaping every sector, consumer behaviour is shifting faster than ever, and geopolitical shocks are redefining supply chains. What makes this disruption more challenging is its unpredictability and pace. CFOs must now function as foresight enablers detecting early signals, modelling scenarios, and funding agility.
It is deeply ironic that the quote ‘Only the paranoid survive’ came from Andy Grove, the former CEO of Intel a company now facing sustained challenges from Nvidia and Chinese semiconductor firms. Even titans can stumble if they fail to adapt. Disruption now comes not just from competitors but from adjacent industries, startups, and platform models. CFOs must build organisations that don’t just absorb shocks but anticipate and capitalise on them.
Innovation has shifted from being a lab function to a boardroom priority. It is also conjunction of two words viz., invention and commercialisation. It’s no longer just about products; it is about new business models, new partnerships, and new ways of delivering value. CFOs must move beyond the ROI lens alone and understand the potential of test-and-learn models, venture capital style investments, and sandbox experimentation.
Take 3M’s example, where 40% of its revenues must come from products introduced in the last five years. Or Ather Energy, incubated by IIT Madras, that scaled into a nationally recognised EV brand where the incubator has raked in a coolk Rs.50 crore from the offer for sale in the public issue. Finance must now fuel innovation not just evaluate it. CFOs must underwrite risk that creates long-term optionality.
Strategic clarity is no longer about five-year forecasts. It’s about adaptive decision-making and dynamic capital allocation. AV Thomas’s investment of ₹25 crore in Chai Kings shows how legacy firms are diversifying into emerging markets a classic case of corporate venture capital. Similarly, Century Pulp’s divestiture of its paper division to ITC for ₹3500 crore underlines the strategic importance of focusing on core competencies.
Organisations are embracing circularity to reduce waste and manage cost, aligning sustainability with strategy. According to an EY India survey, over 74% of Indian corporates plan to divest non-core assets over the next 24 months. CFOs must be stewards of simplification and strategic boldness.
Linear growth is no longer viable. In a post-pandemic economy shaped by digital transformation, CFOs
must support adjacencies, build ecosystems, and simultaneously drive scale and efficiency. Transformational growth is about doing many things at once; entering new markets, exiting declining
verticals, building platforms, and reinventing delivery.
It also involves challenging assumptions. The boldest CFOs support disruptive bets whether transitioning from B2B to B2C, investing in net zero transitions, or acquiring capabilities, not just revenue. Transformational CFOs help the organisation operate with a venture capitalist mindset.
Resilience is no longer reactive; it must be embedded in business design. From climate events to cyberattacks and supply disruptions, organisations must be equipped to bounce forward, not just back. McKinsey outlines six dimensions of resilience – financial, operational, technological, organisational, reputational, and business model. CFOs now oversee more than capital; they govern continuity.
Boards now ask: Do we have the liquidity buffer for the next disruption? Can our cost structure flex if demand collapses? Resilience also includes reputational equity. CFOs must institutionalise preparedness, monitor lead indicators, and embed risk thinking into every process.
Execution is what separates vision from reality. A recent Business Standard report noted Tata Steel’s plan to take out ₹11,000 crore in costs on top of ₹6000 crore already realised in FY25. Such initiatives signal that execution must be relentless. Consumers are price sensitive. Passing cost increases is difficult. The only path forward is variable cost design, continuous upskilling, and capacity flexibility. Execution also means systems that support decision-making at speed.
The CFO must empower frontline managers with real-time data, nurture a culture of ownership, and facilitate productivity through technology. Agility is not about chaos it is about preparation meeting opportunity.
Today’s CFO must speak the language of influence, not just accuracy. Whether explaining investment strategy to the board or decoding ESG disclosures to investors, the ability to narrate numbers is a superpower.
Storytelling brings structure to ambiguity and converts insight into alignment. It is not enough to report that margins shrank. One must explain why, what’s next, and how strategy adapts. Storytelling is also critical in earnings calls, sustainability reporting, and employee town halls. A CFO who can tell a story backed by data earns credibility across all stakeholders.
Stakeholder management has become central to the CFO’s role. With rising public scrutiny, social media activism, and ESG mandates, companies must engage diverse interest groups with integrity. Stakeholders now include investors, employees, regulators, communities, NGOs, and platforms. Each has different expectations—and one misstep can go viral.
CFOs must ensure that communication is consistent, transparent, and backed by ethics. From regulatory filings to advertising messages, every output must reinforce corporate trustworthiness. In this era, compliance is the baseline. What sets leaders apart is principled engagement.
Not all stress is harmful. Eustress, the positive tension that motivates performance, is essential to growth. The Chaordic CFOs doesn’t fear challenge. They harness it. They convert disruption into discipline, ambiguity into architecture, and pressure into possibility.
Moving from DISTRESS to EUSTRESS is about re-framing the CFO’s function: from protector to co-creator, from controller to catalyst. It is about building cultures that don’t avoid risk but learn from it. Eustress is energy with direction. It empowers the organisation to stretch without snapping.
As Alan Kay said, ‘The best way to predict the future is to invent it.’ CFOs now have the mandate and tools to shape the future. But as John C. Maxwell reminds us, ‘If you don’t create the future you want, you must endure the future you get.’
The Chaordic CFO is no longer confined to the balance sheet. They are strategic designers, resilience champions, and change agents. Their mandate is to build organisations that are future-ready fiscally sound, digitally intelligent, and ethically grounded.
This is not just about navigating the next disruption it is about leading the transformation. From DISTRESS to EUSTRESS is not just a framework. It is a call to action.
Contributed by:

R V K S and Associates
Head Office:
No.147, Rajparis Trimeni Towers
GN Chetty Road, TNagar
Chennai, 600017
Branches:
Web: www.rvkassociates.com
Email: assurance@rvkassociates.com
Phone: 044-28150540/541/542
The post Chaordic CFO – Managing DISTRESS in an Uncertain Future appeared first on AGN International.
]]>The post The Pace of Digital Transformation vs Client Readiness appeared first on AGN International.
]]>We are living through an era of profound technological acceleration. From AI-powered audit procedures to cloud-based advisory dashboards, the professional services industry is undergoing sweeping change. Mid-sized accountancy firms, including AGN members, are among those leading the charge—making bold investments in digital infrastructure, training, automation, and analytics to enhance client service and firm profitability. But there’s a problem...
Many clients aren’t keeping pace. In fact, the gap between the digital maturity of professional firms and the readiness of their clients is growing wider, and it’s starting to affect relationships, efficiency, advisory services—and in some cases—billable opportunities. We call this the transformation mismatch: a scenario where the firm is ready to move at digital speed, but the client isn’t equipped (or willing) to follow.
This Global Business Voice paper explores how this misalignment manifests, what it means for the delivery of services and advice, and what practical steps AGN members can take to mitigate the risk and capitalise on the opportunity.
On the move?
Tune into our mini podcast on Spotify at the end of this article for a quick summary of the key insights.
All AGN members are somewhere on the journey to Digital Transformation. The AGN Digital Maturity Diagnostic Tool (accessible to members only) provides AGN members with a diagnostic report and suggestions on key areas of improvement after answering a series of questions. The graphic below presents the four levels.

Here are 7 practical and immediately actionable steps AGN members can take to address client
digital immaturity.
Not all clients are equal in digital terms. Conduct a light-touch assessment of your top 50 clients and
classify them into tiers:
Understanding this segmentation helps you prioritise efforts and tailor approaches.
Generic client emails or newsletters may miss the mark. Consider developing communications that speak
directly to the client’s digital level. For example:
Understanding this segmentation helps you prioritise efforts and tailor approaches.
Some clients simply don’t understand the ‘why’ of digital transformation. Host informal webinars,
breakfast briefings, or 1:1 sessions to:
This is education without the jargon.
Engage your clients in developing their own digital journey. Help them define where they are now, where
they want to be in 12–24 months, and what steps they’ll take to get there. Consider offering these as part
of an onboarding pack, client review, or even as a chargeable advisory product.
Include milestones like:
Package services that are not only digitally delivered, but enhanced by digital capability. Examples:
These services exemplify your digital ability and offer clients tangible benefit. They can demonstrate to
laggards, what laggards are missing out on.
Your partners and senior managers are often the closest to clients. Invest in training to help them. What
are the conversation starters? Do your partners/managers have a script around this topic? Are they
equipped with recommended solutions for those that show an interest?
Training might focus on:
Offer time-limited discounts, bundled training, or “first 90 days free” options on new digital services.
This reduces the barrier to entry and lets clients experience the value before committing fully.
It’s about creating momentum and lowering risk—for both sides.

AGN member firms are digitalising at an impressive pace. According to internal benchmarks and diagnostics, over 70% of firms have adopted some level of automation, AI experimentation, cloud systems integration, and dashboard reporting in the last 24 months.
They’re doing this not just to improve margins, but to:
However, client firms—particularly SMEs—are a mixed bag, and so these changes don’t alway get imdiate traction with clients.
Despite the steady advance of digital solutions within accountancy firms, many clients remain hesitant,
slow, or outright resistant to change. This hesitancy can be puzzling to firms that see the benefits so
clearly—but it is rooted in real, often deeply embedded challenges. Let’s explore the most common
causes:
Fear of Cost
Many SME clients see digital transformation as an expensive and potentially risky commitment.
Whether it’s the upfront investment in new software, the training costs for their team, or concerns about licensing and subscription models, clients often perceive digitisation as a luxury they cannot afford. There is also a lack of clarity around the return on investment (ROI). They ask, “Will this actually save me money or just complicate things further?”
Skill Gaps and Confidence Issues
Digital tools require new skills—not just technical knowledge, but also comfort in navigating platforms, interpreting data,
and making decisions based on digital insights. Many small business teams lack in-house tech-savvy staff. For older business owners or traditional sectors (e.g., agriculture, manufacturing), digital
language feels foreign. This lack of confidence results in avoidance.
Change Fatigue
The past five years have been particularly turbulent. COVID-19, supply chain disruptions, hybrid work adaptation, economic volatility, and regulatory shifts have already stretched the adaptive capacity of many SMEs. As a result, digital transformation often drops to the bottom of the priority list—perceived as “another initiative” they simply don’t have the bandwidth for.
No Burning Platform
In many cases, clients simply don’t see the urgency. Their current systems—however inefficient—still function. The absence of a major problem (e.g., a compliance
breach, cyberattack, or missed
opportunity) means there is little
impetus to act. The logic goes: “If it’s not broken, why fix it?”
Fear of Losing Control
Clients often feel they will lose oversight if too much is automated or digitised. Many owner/managers have built their companies on hands-on involvement, and the idea of
systems making decisions or exposing real-time data to others can feel threatening.
Previous Bad Experiences
Some clients have had poor experiences with digital tools in the past—software that was clunky, training that was
insufficient, or consultants that
disappeared once the invoice was paid. These stories linger and shape future resistance
The consequences for AGN firms are significant. As clients hesitate or stall, the firm’s ability to fully leverage its own digital infrastructure becomes compromised. And more than that—relationships begin to strain, as client expectations and firm capabilities move out of sync.
AGN firms are increasingly fluent in digital working. From automated data extraction in audit engagements to predictive analytics in advisory, these capabilities are now embedded in many firms’ delivery models. However, when clients remain rooted in paper-based systems or low-tech workflows, the resulting disconnect is stark.
Scenario: For example, a mid-sized accounting firm rolled out an AI-assisted tax reconciliation platform designed to reduce turnaround time by 60%. However, nearly a third of clients declined to use it, citing uncertainty about “AI accuracy” and a preference for their long-time spreadsheet system. The firm is left straddling two workflows—one advanced, one antiquated—undermining efficiency and morale. Firms must then manage the cognitive dissonance of operating at two speeds: high-performance digital with some clients, and analogue friction with others. The costs—both operational and emotional—are real.
Most AGN members have made significant investments in digitisation—through client portals, automated workflows, intelligent document management systems, and AI-assisted compliance. These investments are intended to increase profitability, scalability, and consistency. But crucially, they rely on client participation to deliver value.
Scenario: If only half your clients upload documents through the portal, the manual chasing begins again. If clients ignore task alerts or continue to send documents via email or post, the system breaks down. Exceptions multiply. Instead of automation freeing time, your staff spend it correcting or working around the exceptions.
This stalls ROI and creates a hidden cost burden—you pay twice: once for the digital infrastructure, and again for the manual work required when clients don’t engage with it.
Worse still, this client behaviour often goes unbilled, because firms feel awkward charging clients for inefficiencies
they themselves created.
The growing advisory proposition of AGN members depends on data—good data, recent data, reliable data. Whether it’s offering scenario modelling, ESG reporting, cash flow forecasting, or strategic dashboards, the fuel for these services is accurate and timely input from the client. Without it, even the most sophisticated advisory offer falters.
Scenario: A firm develops a real-time KPI dashboard for a key client. It’s ready to go live. But the client only updates their ledgers once a quarter and refuses to automate bank feeds. The dashboard becomes a digital ornament—impressive, but ultimately unused.
The trust built through advisory work is undermined when insights are incomplete or out of date. And from the firm’s side, the advisory effort becomes unscalable when every project requires a manual workaround just to get basic client data.
Digital transformation is not just a technical project—it’s a behavioural and cultural shift. AGN firms may have the systems and the know-how, but unless clients can be brought into the ecosystem, that transformation will be incomplete. Addressing the lag is not about forcing clients forward—it’s about understanding the reasons behind their resistance, and finding empathetic, ways to help them take the next step. That’s the opportunity for AGN members: to become not just accounting firms with great tec—but true transformation partners for the clients they serve.
While the mismatch presents challenges, it also unlocks one of the biggest growth opportunities for mid-sized firms: become your client’s digital transformation guide. This is advisory with a capital A—and it’s exactly the journey AGN’s Advisory Migration Methodology (AMM) supports. The four regions of the AGN Advisory Migration Methodology (Data & Skills Inputs, Service Framework, Stakeholder Environment, and Outputs & Reporting) can be directly applied to assisting a mutual shift towards digital transformation and post digital advisory. The fact is your firm already understands the levers of the methodology – the opportunity here is to apply them to yours and the client’s business.

Top Tips:
Use what the software can provide to improve Outputs & Reporting. Help a client design board-level easy to access and interpret dashboards.
Offer training sessions to teach Foundational Skills data analysis skills to your client’s finance team.
This not only supports your client—it differentiates your firm in an increasingly commoditised market.
Think carefully about the Stakeholder & Business Environment. Understand how to manage change resistance in the client team.
Digital transformation has shifted from optional to existential. Your firm may already be adopting
the tools, platforms, and thinking required to thrive in the new era—but your clients may not
be ready. This readiness gap is now a defining feature of modern professional service delivery.
Firms that fail to bring their clients along risk frustration, underutilised investments, and missed
revenue.
But those who embrace the opportunity to educate, support and lead clients into the digital
age will:
Tune into our mini podcast on Spotify for a quick summary of the key insights.
Copyright © 2025 AGN International Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted by non-members without prior permission of AGN International Ltd.
The post The Pace of Digital Transformation vs Client Readiness appeared first on AGN International.
]]>The post Resilience Strategies for Businesses – Navigate Economic Uncertainty appeared first on AGN International.
]]>Businesses operating within a global economy full of unpredictability need to develop capabilities that help them not just endure economic recessions but also emerge from them with enhanced strength and a competitive edge.
Economic uncertainty stemming from market changes, geopolitical issues or unexpected global phenomena such as pandemics forces businesses to reassess their operational approaches and growth strategies. Organisations must prioritise resilience-building because it has become essential for their survival.
Financial resilience starts with rigorous planning. Businesses need to perform stress tests on financial forecasts while keeping ample cash reserves and establishing various financial scenarios for revenue streams and capital requirements. Companies with thorough knowledge of their cash flow patterns that establish backup plans achieve superior decision-making capabilities during unstable times.
Budget flexibility is essential. Instead of fixed yearly plans, organisations should utilise rolling forecasts, which are modified based on current conditions. Evaluate non-essential spending while directing investments towards activities that sustain primary income sources and encourage long-term business expansion.
Consulting business advisory professionals offers valuable supplementary perspectives. Through expert advice, businesses can establish risk-adjusted financial plans while examining debt responsibilities and pinpointing potential financial weaknesses before reaching crisis levels.
Businesses that depend entirely on one product or customer group increase their risk in economic recessions. Spreading risk across multiple ventures enables businesses to capture new growth opportunities through diversification.
Businesses need to evaluate their current product or service selections to identify opportunities for adding complementary offerings. A business that delivers services in person could expand its market reach by adopting digital delivery methods.
Businesses can lower their reliance on a single economic region or sector through the feasible exploration of new customer segments and international markets. Stabilising revenue through small diversification efforts does not require major alterations.
Businesses need to maintain operational flexibility to scale their operations either up or down swiftly when facing economic uncertainty. The strategy affects all operational areas, including staffing solutions and supply chain management, and extends to production capabilities and distribution methods.
Businesses can benefit from adopting flexible employment models, which include casual contracts and outsourcing of non-essential tasks. Developing strong supplier partnerships helps businesses achieve more responsive inventory control and better cost management.
Companies must prioritise digital transformation investments to progress effectively. Through the implementation of cloud systems and remote work solutions alongside automated procedures, organisations can achieve faster responses and lower fixed expenses but still keep continuous operations.
Periodic evaluations of operational workflows reveal inefficiencies and redundant processes that transform into liabilities during economic downturns. Streamlining business operations boosts day-to-day performance and helps protect the company during economic downturns.
Organisations gain internal and external stakeholder confidence when leadership demonstrates transparency and decisiveness. In periods of uncertainty, leaders need to establish consistent communication with their employees as well as customers, suppliers and investors.
Effective communication regarding business targets and financial status, alongside strategic shifts, promotes trust and alignment. When employees comprehend how their work supports their organisation’s sustainability and recovery, they demonstrate higher engagement and productivity levels.
The participation of essential staff members in contingency preparations and scenario analysis is a fundamental requirement. When employees from various departments work together, they discover useful insights and develop joint responsibility for resilience measures.
Effective tax planning during economic stress delivers significant savings while boosting cash flow for businesses. Companies need to regularly evaluate their tax responsibilities while checking for possible reliefs, deductions and deferral opportunities, particularly when government stimulus periods or downturn-related concessions are available.
Businesses can achieve compliance and maximise benefits by engaging experienced tax accountants in Sydney. Tax professionals provide guidance on business entity restructuring as well as review capital purchases and superannuation contribution planning to reduce tax liabilities.
Keeping abreast of changing tax laws and regulatory requirements helps prevent expensive penalties and lost opportunities, which become crucial when legislative changes occur rapidly.
The power to adapt represents one of the most significant characteristics of businesses that endure. Economic signals and consumer behaviour changes, along with technological breakthroughs, can cause markets to change direction swiftly. Businesses should develop the capability to pivot quickly to address market changes directly.
Perform regular market research to stay informed about industry trends together with competitor actions and customer preferences. Apply this data to improve your value proposition or modify your pricing strategies and consider rebranding as needed.
Customers usually reconsider how they spend their money when economic conditions are unstable. Companies that respond to customer needs with flexible payment options and customised products or services maintain stronger customer loyalty.
Strong and supportive associations with customers and suppliers become essential lifelines during tough times.
With customers, go beyond transactional interactions. Understand their evolving needs and pain points. Use value-added services and flexible payment options, along with loyalty programs, to maintain customer engagement.
Effective supplier relationships require transparent operations along with proactive communication. Building solid partnerships with suppliers results in advantageous contract terms and inventory access benefits, as well as cooperative problem-solving during difficult times.
When economic conditions require compromise, better long-term results emerge from collaborative partnerships instead of adversarial negotiations.
To effectively manage economic changes, businesses require a comprehensive understanding of key performance indicators (KPIs) along with access to real-time data. Reliable data systems deliver improved forecasting capabilities alongside performance monitoring and help uncover cost-saving possibilities.
Scenario planning is equally critical. Build best-case, base-case and worst-case scenarios to understand potential market changes that could affect your business. When preparing for economic changes, ensure to analyse variables like currency fluctuations along with supply disruptions and regulatory shifts and changes in consumer behaviour.
Our objective should be centred around preparing for future events instead of attempting to predict them. Leadership teams that utilise data-driven insights make decisions that have stronger outcomes and lower associated risks.
Calibre Business Advisory is here to help businesses build their operations on solid financial planning and operational adaptability, as well as to transform uncertain situations into business opportunities. No single method ensures protection from external disruptions, but Calibre can develop a comprehensive strategy to increase your company’s capacity to survive difficulties and prepare it for successful recovery.
Businesses gain strategic clarity through external perspectives when they engage expert partners like Calibre at critical times. When strong internal leadership joins forces with continuous improvement practices, businesses establish a foundation that supports true resilience.
Contributed by:

Calibre Business Advisory
Level 8
1 York Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000
AUSTRALIA
Web: https://calibreba.com.au/
Email: tim.sury@calibreba.com.au
Phone: +61 2 9261 2177
The post Resilience Strategies for Businesses – Navigate Economic Uncertainty appeared first on AGN International.
]]>The post James Moore CEO Suzanne Forbes and Partner Justyna Mueller Named Best-In-State CPAs by Forbes appeared first on AGN International.
]]>In creating the list, Forbes (the national media company and no relation to Suzanne) initially identified thousands of candidates via interviews with industry leaders, outside nominations, editorial research and an independent advisory board of CPAs. Candidates were then assessed under multiple categories, including achievements, influence on the accounting profession, individual honors, thought leadership and more, before the list was narrowed down to the top CPAs in each state across the nation.
“Many great leaders in our industry are doing amazing work, and the pace can be challenging with the amount of change in businesses and communities today,” said Suzanne. ”Being selected for this honor makes me even more certain the leadership decisions I’m making are vital to the success of our organization and profession.”
“Throughout my career, my goal has been to help both my clients and my fellow CPAs thrive as our industry evolves,” said Justyna. “That makes this recognition from Forbes even more meaningful. I’m truly honored.”
Click here to view the entire Best-In-State CPAs list on the Forbes website.
James Moore, founded in 1964, is a business consulting firm with offices in Daytona Beach, DeLand, Gainesville, Ocala and Tallahassee, Florida. The firm specialises in providing tax, auditing, accounting and controllership, data analytics, human resources, technology and wealth management services to clients nationwide.

CONTACT:
Stacy Dreher
Chief Growth Officer
5931 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
(352) 378-1331
Stacy.Dreher@jmco.com
The post James Moore CEO Suzanne Forbes and Partner Justyna Mueller Named Best-In-State CPAs by Forbes appeared first on AGN International.
]]>The post Why Should Accounting Be Considered a STEM Discipline? appeared first on AGN International.
]]>Recognising accounting as a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) field not only enhances financial literacy among innovators but also instils sense of accountability, essential for sustainable growth.
In a rapidly evolving business landscape, there is a strong case for integration of accounting into STEM disciplines which is also gaining momentum globally. This shift is particularly pertinent for India, where a burgeoning focus on STEM-driven entrepreneurship only further increases the necessity of robust accounting knowledge.
Recognising accounting as a STEM field not only enhances financial literacy among innovators but also instils a critical sense of accountability, essential for sustainable growth.
Traditionally, accounting has been viewed through a purely financial lens. However, the modern accounting profession increasingly intersects with technology and data analytics, not to speak of risk management, aligning closely with STEM fields. This integration facilitates advanced financial modelling, predictive analytics, and efficient resource management, all of which are vital in today’s data-driven economy. If accounting were part of the STEM portfolio, it would be clear that it is a pathway to putting high-level technical skills to practical use.
India’s entrepreneurial ecosystem is witnessing a surge in STEM-related start-ups, ranging from biotechnology to information technology. While these ventures are often rich in innovation, they may stumble on the financial acumen necessary for long-term success. Integrating accounting education into STEM curricula can bridge this gap, equipping entrepreneurs with the skills to manage finances effectively, assess economic viability, and make informed strategic decisions. This fusion ensures that technological innovations are supported by sound financial planning, increasing the likelihood of sustainable success.
In an era where dynamic pricing has become the norm across industries from e-commerce and ride-hailing services to airline ticketing and renewable energy, accounting plays a crucial role in strategic decision-making for STEM entrepreneurs. The ability to analyse cost structures, determine break-even points, and assess marginal costs is essential for businesses operating in volatile pricing environments. Knowledge of accounting empowers entrepreneurs to optimise pricing strategies based on real-time financial data, ensuring profitability while remaining competitive. By integrating cost accounting principles with data analytics, start-ups can make informed decisions on pricing elasticity, discounting strategies, and revenue optimisation. This financial acumen not only helps businesses stay agile but also fosters long-term sustainability in a rapidly evolving marketplace.
Incorporating accounting into STEM education fosters a culture of accountability. Entrepreneurs trained in accounting principles are better prepared to implement transparent financial practices, adhere to regulatory requirements, and build trust with investors and stakeholders. This accountability is crucial in mitigating risks and maintaining the integrity of business operations.
Entrepreneurs today operate in an environment where external financing, whether through debt or equity, is not just an option but a necessity for scaling their businesses. However, with increasing reliance on external funding comes heightened scrutiny from investors, lenders, and regulatory authorities. Equity investors demand transparency in financial reporting to assess the viability of their investments, while lenders require assurance that financial obligations can be met. As financial transactions grow in complexity, so do accounting standards and compliance requirements, making it imperative for entrepreneurs to have a strong grasp of financial discipline. Adhering to recognised accounting principles and regulatory norms is no longer a procedural formality but a fundamental expectation that determines access to capital, investor confidence, and long-term credibility.
Despite the enormous potential of many start-ups, failure to meet these expectations has led to serious consequences. In recent years, several high-profile startups in India have suffered significant setbacks due to governance failures and financial mismanagement. Byju’s, once a dominant player in the edtech sector, found itself entangled in financial controversies, including delayed reporting, misaligned growth projections, and concerns over fund utilisation, all of which contributed to a drastic erosion of investor trust.
BharatPe, a promising fintech company, saw leadership disputes expose deeper governance flaws, raising red flags about internal controls and accountability. Zilingo, a fashion e-commerce startup, collapsed under allegations of financial misrepresentation, leading to the ousting of its CEO and eventual business failure. GoMechanic, an automotive service start-up, admitted to inflating revenue figures, triggering a crisis that resulted in mass layoffs and investor exits. Similarly, Mojocare, a health and wellness start-up, came under scrutiny for financial irregularities that further underscored the need for rigorous compliance frameworks.
These references serve as a stark reminder that financial missteps, whether intentional or due to negligence, can derail even the most promising ventures. Investors, regulators, and other stakeholders now expect start-ups to maintain not only innovative business models but also sound financial discipline. The ability to navigate complex accounting standards and compliance requirements is no longer optional but a prerequisite for survival in an increasingly scrutinised start-up ecosystem. As the funding environment becomes more selective, entrepreneurs who prioritise financial transparency and governance will stand a far better chance of securing capital, sustaining investor confidence, and ultimately building businesses that last.
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors are becoming central to business evaluations, not to speak of taxation issues, worldwide. In India, regulatory bodies like the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) have proposed expanding the sustainable finance framework, emphasising the need for comprehensive ESG reporting. Accountants play a pivotal role in this context by identifying relevant metrics, developing measurement methodologies, and ensuring the accuracy of ESG disclosures. Their expertise ensures that companies not only comply with regulations but also contribute positively to societal goals.
As India continues to advance in STEM fields, recognising accounting as an integral component of this framework is imperative. This recognition will equip entrepreneurs and professionals with the financial expertise necessary to navigate complex business landscapes, uphold accountability, and meet evolving ESG standards. By embracing accounting within the STEM paradigm, India can foster a more holistic approach to education and business, driving innovation that is both economically viable and socially responsible.
Contributed by:

R V K S and Associates
Head Office Location
No.147, Rajparis Trimeni Towers
GN Chetty Road,TNagar, Chennai- 600017.
Branches: Chennai, Banglore, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra
Web: www.rvkassociates.com
Email: assurance@rvkassociates.com
Phone: 044-28150540/541/542
The post Why Should Accounting Be Considered a STEM Discipline? appeared first on AGN International.
]]>The post James Moore Named One of Accounting Today’s 2025 Firms to Watch and Regional Leaders! appeared first on AGN International.
]]>The leading information resource for public accountants nationwide, Accounting Today cited James Moore as one of 45 firms across the nation that bear watching (coming in at number 14 on the Firms to Watch list). This selection is based on revenues and growth, with Accounting Today noting that some companies previously named to the list are now among the top 100 accounting firms in the country.
The organization also cited James Moore as one of the top accounting firms in the Gulf Coast region, an area that includes the states of Florida, Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. The firm recorded 6.89% growth in 2024 to place it at number 8 in the region.
“In the three years in which we’ve been named a Firm to Watch, we’ve moved up in standing ever year,” said firm CEO Suzanne Forbes. “This steady growth and progression up the ranks has been possible through our commitment to thoughtful strategies, embracing new technologies and processes, providing the highest level of service for our clients, and focusing on a culture that embraces the unique skills of our team.”
James Moore, founded in 1964, is a business consulting firm with offices in Daytona Beach, DeLand, Gainesville, Ocala and Tallahassee, Florida. The firm specialises in providing tax, auditing, accounting and controllership, data analytics, human resources, technology and wealth management services to clients nationwide.

CONTACT:
Stacy Dreher
Chief Growth Officer
5931 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
(352) 378-1331
Stacy.Dreher@jmco.com
The post James Moore Named One of Accounting Today’s 2025 Firms to Watch and Regional Leaders! appeared first on AGN International.
]]>The post Private Equity – A New Era for Accounting Firms appeared first on AGN International.
]]>Private equity (PE) is fundamentally reshaping the accounting industry, offering growth, expansion, and competitive positioning, while introducing complex strategic considerations for firms navigating this transformation.
On the move?
Tune into our mini podcast on Spotify at the end of this article for a quick summaryof the key insights.
The traditional partnership model has long been the backbone of professional services. Definitions are unclear, but there are likely between 20 and 50 active PE-funded consolidators in each of the US and UK markets. Globally, the PE phenomenon is moving into other jurisdictions like Canada, Australia, and some other European and emerging markets.
This AGN Global Business Voice brings the thinking up-to-date and invites AGN members to think widely about their future options, identifying some “must-do now” actions.
Evaluate Alternative Ownership Models
Firms should explore various ownership structures beyond full PE buyouts, such as hybrid models, Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs), or minority investor arrangements.
Drive Long-Term Growth and Modernisation
To remain competitive—whether pursuing PE investment or staying independent—firms must focus on sustainable growth strategies. This includes investing in digital transformation, strengthening talent acquisition & retention, and the evolution of their service offering in light of AI and technological impacts. It will be important to preserve and build an inclusive entrepreneurial culture.
Prepare for Regulatory and Structural Changes
As PE reshapes firm ownership, accounting firms must stay ahead of evolving regulations and industry oversight. Understanding compliance risks and governance changes will be critical for maintaining trust and credibility.
Assess Financial Risks, Including Debt Burden
PE-backed firms often take on significant debt through leveraged buyouts. Traditional firms should carefully analyse the financial implications of PE investment and ensure they do not compromise long-term stability for short-term gains.
Traditionally, accounting firms have been structured as partnerships, offering long-term career paths culminating in equity ownership for high-performing professionals. The introduction of PE into the sector has begun to change this model.
PE investment is cyclical, with firms typically undergoing a ‘flip’ to new investors after a few years. While the first wave of PE-backed firms in the accounting sector appears to be achieving initial return targets, it remains to be seen how sustainable these models will be over multiple investment cycles.
One of the core mechanisms of PE investment is the use of leveraged buyouts (“LBOs”), where external funding is used to finance the acquisition of firms. While this approach can accelerate growth, it also introduces new financial risks:
By bringing in top specialists and investment muscle, PE-funded businesses are leveraging technology and new expertise to drive efficiency, attract talented professionals, and provide great service and rewarding careers. We should anticipate notable successes as they drive high-quality, repeatable, and scalable approaches, such as technology driven auditing.
The PE phenomenon presents opportunities for conventionally funded firms: PE-backed firms’ technologies and expertise could become commercialised and more accessible, affordable, and common. Additionally, bespoke, high-touch, premium offerings like specialised tax services or sector-specific expertise may prefer other service models. Already, some conventionally funded firms are reporting an influx of recruits from the PE-backed environments — potentially the early stages of professionals opting for alternatives to professional life in the PE-backed models?
The accounting sector has undergone a dramatic shift in ownership structures over the last 30 years, moving from unlimited liability partnerships of technical experts to corporate ownership of external investors. The latest shift catalysed by private equity has yet to be fully tested by regulatory bodies:
As firms navigate this evolving landscape, the key to success lies in strategic positioning
and informed decision-making. Firms should:
Essentially firms have an opportunity to pursue active modernisation and investment strategies – this attracts the PE community. And in more than the short term, whether with PE or other means, firms will need to adapt their strategies to remain competitive.
Private equity represents neither a demolisher nor a panacea for accounting firms. But it undoubtedly represents a significant structural and competitive shift in the industry. If navigated effectively, it can drive both substantial growth and innovation, and significant opportunities for those choosing PE-backed models, or indeed the various alternative models that exist.
As AGN supports its members through these changes, we focus on equipping firms with insights and frameworks to thrive in this evolving landscape. PE is a transformative strategic tool that requires careful management. The choice for firms is not simply “PE or you lose”; rather, it is about how to adapt, grow, and create sustainable value while navigating the opportunities and challenges of PE investment where it is applied.
For further information on this topic or anything relating to the AGN International Association of Accounting and Advisory Firms or to become an AGN member, please email your closest AGN Regional Director (see below) or go directly to www.agn.org.
Malcolm Ward
CEO AGN International
mward@agn.org
Jean Xu
AP Regional Manager
jxu@agn.org
Marlijn Lawson
EMEA Regional Director
mlawson@agn.org
Cindy Frey CPA, CGMA
Americas Regional Director
cfrey@agn.org
Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)
Hybrid Partnership-PE Model
Cooperative Ownership Model
Strategic Alliances with Shared Ownership Pools
Minority Investor + Employee Option Pool
Public Listing via Alternative Investment Markets
Private Family Office “Evergreen” Investment Model
Tune into our mini podcast on Spotify for a quick summary of the key insights.
Copyright © 2025 AGN International Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted by non-members without prior permission of AGN International Ltd.
The post Private Equity – A New Era for Accounting Firms appeared first on AGN International.
]]>